Skip to content

Scouting for novel bacteria

Few things are so mys­te­rious as bac­teria. Indeed, the Great Plate Anomaly has baf­fled micro­bial biol­o­gists for more than a cen­tury: While mil­lions of bac­te­rial species pop­u­late the globe, only about one-​​tenth of a per­cent are cul­tivable in the lab.

The rest have long been con­sid­ered “uncul­tivable,” but North­eastern biology pro­fessor Slava Epstein thinks otherwise.

In two papers released ear­lier this week in the journal Applied and Envi­ron­mental Micro­bi­ology, Epstein pro­poses a new “scout model” as a solu­tion to the Great Plate Anomaly. The model sug­gests that an evo­lu­tionary defense mech­a­nism ran­domly drives indi­vidual bac­teria into and out of dor­mancy. This cre­ates a pool of inac­tive cells that do not grow and remain essen­tially invis­ible, and are thus ignored.

This “dark matter,” as Epstein calls it, is the bac­te­rial insur­ance policy: Envi­ron­mental or antibi­otic chal­lenges cannot kill dor­mant cells. A tiny frac­tion will ran­domly wake up into activity, unwit­tingly “scouting” the envi­ron­ment for the rest of the pop­u­la­tion. If con­di­tions are chal­lenging, these pio­neers will die, to be replaced by a new gen­er­a­tion of sim­i­larly awak­ening scouts. How­ever, if con­di­tions are good, they will grow, form a new pop­u­la­tion and may even send mol­e­c­ular invi­ta­tions out for others to wake up and join the party.

“What I’m saying is many so-​​called ‘uncul­tivable’ species are per­fectly cul­tivable, and there may be nothing unusual about them. It’s just that, number one, they are rare and, number two, the over­whelming majority of cells of any species in nature are dor­mant at any given time. They wake up ran­domly at low frequency.”

Slava Epstein with lab member Maria Sizova.

If Epstein is cor­rect, then new cul­ti­va­tion methods and stronger efforts could open the door to an influx of novel species. Since bac­teria bring with them mol­e­cules spe­cial­ized in killing their neigh­bors, the scout model could also reopen the field of antibi­otic dis­covery, which had its last break­through in the 1980s.

Epstein’s model ques­tions the long-​​held assump­tion that micro­bial growth is time-​​dependent. That is, some species take longer to grow than others, and since typ­ical lab cul­tures only last a short period, the longer-​​term bac­teria never get a chance to grow.

Epstein’s lab hypoth­e­sized that if this were the case, then long-​​term cul­ti­va­tion should at first pro­duce the bac­teria that com­monly grow in the lab, like E. coli, fol­lowed by more novel species later on. But when the team let a bac­te­rial sample cul­ti­vate for a year and a half (one of the longest cul­tures ever per­formed), researchers found the same fre­quency of novel bac­teria throughout the time period.

If the scout model is cor­rect, then the prob­a­bility of finding a novel species is the same regard­less of incu­ba­tion time: If a sample con­tains a mil­lion cells of one pop­u­la­tion and only 10 cells of another, then the chances of “cap­turing” an active scout out of the latter are minimal.

“You see?” he said. “Then the dis­covery of new species will be a random event. It will be a game of num­bers.”

Cookies on Northeastern sites

This website uses cookies and similar technologies to understand your use of our website and give you a better experience. By continuing to use the site or closing this banner without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies and other technologies. To find out more about our use of cookies and how to change your settings, please go to our Privacy Statement.