Skip to content
  • Washington spends 17 times more fighting Isis than Britain

    Newsweek - 06/16/2015

    However, some experts believe the lack of contribution from Washington’s coalition partners is of less significance in the battle against Isis than persuading local Sunni forces to co-operate with the coalition and the Iraqi military to help defeat the terror group. “If I were to rank all of the different reasons for the growth of Islamic State. Britain’s paltry financial contribution might be number 1,000,” says Max Abrahms, professor of political science at Boston’s Northeastern University and member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

    “I’m not overly concerned about Britain’s contribution,” he adds. “What we really need are ground forces and those ground forces are not going to come from the US and the UK in large numbers, they have to come from the Sunni tribes. We need local co-operation.”

  • Cookies on Northeastern sites

    This website uses cookies and similar technologies to understand your use of our website and give you a better experience. By continuing to use the site or closing this banner without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies and other technologies. To find out more about our use of cookies and how to change your settings, please go to our Privacy Statement.