Skip to content
  • Defendants bend under tyranny of plea deal

    The Boston Globe - 01/22/2013

    MOST OF us know that we have a criminal justice system that rewards confession with leniency. Many are less aware of the coin’s other side — that the few who contemplate asking a judge and jury to decide whether they are guilty are threatened with far greater punishment solely for exercising their right to a trial.

    In the Aaron Swartz case, the US attorney apparently offered six months but threatened many years. Such a disparity has nothing to do with determining guilt and appropriate sentencing, and everything to do with protecting the overwhelming power of the prosecution and its interest in coercing the vast majority of defendants to plead guilty.

    The system is omnipresent in the federal courts, and if Carmen Ortiz deserves criticism, then so does every other US attorney. It’s shameful that it took a suicide to bring the issue to broad public attention.

    Michael Meltsner

    Boston

    The writer is a professor at Northeastern University School of Law.

  • Cookies on Northeastern sites

    This website uses cookies and similar technologies to understand your use of our website and give you a better experience. By continuing to use the site or closing this banner without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies and other technologies. To find out more about our use of cookies and how to change your settings, please go to our Privacy Statement.