Skip to content
  • A-Rod is Unrepentant and Vows Appeal

    Huffington Post - 01/11/2014

    Midday on January 11, 2014, Arbitrator Federic Horowitz issued his expected decision upholding the suspension of Alex Rodriquez under the terms of the agreement reached by Major League Baseball and reducing its duration from 211 games to 162 games, sidelining A-Rod for the 2014 season. Within minutes, Mr. Rodriquez issued his response attacking the result. He said the outcome “sadly comes as no surprise.” What could he expect, he alleged, from a labor arbitration system that was unjust and a League that was “corrupt?”

    It is impossible to comment on, or criticize, the Arbitrator’s opinion because, as of yet, it has not been made public. What should be said, however, is that A-Rod’s vow to bring the merits of his case to a “Federal Judge” has absolutely no basis in law. This strategy demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of labor arbitration in the American labor relations system.

    As the MLB Players Association stated in its response to the ruling, the decision of the Arbitrator is “final and binding.” That means under the parties’ collective bargaining agreement there is no appeal to a state or federal court on the merits of the Arbitrator’s decision. The United States Supreme Court in 1960 plainly stated that the role of the court was not to review a labor arbitration award on its merits. There are only limited occasions where a court will intervene in arbitration, in particular where the arbitrator was not neutral and failed to disclose a prior personal or business relationship with one party or the other. Nothing of that sort is involved here. Mr. Horowitz was selected by both the MLB and the MLBPA to hear these disputes. He is a well-respected and much-experienced labor neutral.

    As this case proceeded to arbitration, it was apparent to any observer that the legal team that supports Rodriquez preferred a venue other than arbitration in which to air its allegations about the Commissioner. In any case, the Rodriquez arbitration case is over. You get nine innings and then you sit down on the bench and wait for 2015.

  • Cookies on Northeastern sites

    This website uses cookies and similar technologies to understand your use of our website and give you a better experience. By continuing to use the site or closing this banner without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies and other technologies. To find out more about our use of cookies and how to change your settings, please go to our Privacy Statement.